🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the UK, and it appears it’s time for a re-evaluation. As time has passed, an celebration that started out as a celebration and reminder of heritage, traditions and links between international African diaspora communities, has developed a commercial tone, broadening to incorporate events where individuals of African heritage are compensated to speak with Caucasian groups about hidden biases and supportive partnership. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s generated a rise in the industry of showcasing anti-racist commitment. However, that period has concluded. The tide has reached its height, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what raising awareness is for.

The Background of Black History Celebration

First commemorated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of celebration and reflection in the second week of February. Black History Month evolved from this initiative and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the US and Canada in the second month, but also in the tenth month in the United Kingdom, Deutschland, Éire and the Holland.

The period has developed since that time, focusing less on the histories of the slave trade across the Atlantic and civil rights battles, and more on prominent Black figures in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and extensively acknowledging the impact Black people have made to mold society. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with talks and cultural events. But the method the month is celebrated is a manifestation of the contemporary political context. How it develops is a valuable example in how assimilation leads to dismantling: the restructuring of Black History Month has impeded the purpose of it, which is to tackle embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Little demonstrates how critical it is to rethink Black History Month better than the particular moment in which it takes place this year. In the United Kingdom, a resurgent right in the shape of the Reform political group is ahead in surveys. In the summer we observed the largest far-right rally in the UK's past. a prominent political figure, the African descendant in charge of the Tory party, is a firm opponent of anti-racism activism, and we are in a position where a legislator gains confidence to state that the absence of Caucasian individuals in parts of a city is a source of worry. Meanwhile, ultra-nationalist movements are growing in the EU as a complete entity.

In the United States, a colossal assault against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been taken, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the top legal institutions of the country. A effort to scrub Black history and legacy from the historical documents is in progress. One of the political figure's early administrative commands focused on the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the Smithsonian Institution, accusing them of a coordinated and broad attempt to rewrite our Nation’s history” by portraying America “as naturally discriminatory”.

Against this backdrop, the observance represents how little it can be impactful if it is restricted to either dutiful corporate observances, or politically neutered festivities of former accomplishments, rather than challenging the situation of the contemporary world. It also demonstrates how its restricted time span means that it is detached from the more extensive continuous action that is needed. Denise Miller, a educator at a learning establishment, articulated it most accurately when she raised concerns about the fleeting superficial actions of the month. “The difficulty with embracing a superficial method”, she wrote, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month turns into a brief show rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Establishing how to adapt, revise and extend actions for fair treatment and appreciation in such times of discouragement and concern is a challenging endeavor. There is a temptation to just do away with observances such as Black History Month entirely, believing they are no longer suitable, or are remnants of an period that has failed to deliver.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and legacy of racial movements – community-based BLM initiatives, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and certainly, even commercial engagements – form an foundation that a considerable labor has been invested in. It is there not merely to decline as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, regresses), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month look like? To begin with, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is dispersed through the year (as some institutions are already starting to implement), parts of its content (particularly around notable African descendants) integrated into school curriculums. It would also be a time that does not evade political issues, and provides room for people, particularly youth, to express their concerns and stories. What value has mere awareness of the bygone era when it ignores the contemporary truth of far-right rallies in the public spaces? Establishments who observe it should not be comforted with the passive language of hidden discrimination and sensitivity to subtle slights, but confronted with the risks that affect everyone if opposition to discrimination is not treated with importance. In short, Black History Month should be made current, critical, and adaptive. Perhaps an total re-identification is required – Black History is Now Month.